Prevalencia de embarazo ectópico en el Hospital Carlos Andrade Marín, 2017 a 2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47464/MetroCiencia/vol28/1/2020/58-65Palabras clave:
Embarazo ectópico, prevalencia, trompa de falopio, factores de riesgoResumen
Objetivos: 1) Determinar la prevalencia de embarazo ectópico en el Servicio de Alto Riesgo Obstétrico del Hospital Carlos Andrade Marín. 2) Identificar los factores de riesgo asociados con esta patología. Métodos: se realizó un estudio descriptivo, de corte transversal, retrospectivo, tomando en cuenta a las pacientes ingresadas con diagnóstico de Embarazo Ectópico al Servicio de Alto Riesgo del Hospital Carlos Andrade Marín, en el periodo del 1 de enero del 2017 al 31 de mayo del 2019. Resultados: durante el período comprendido entre el 1 de enero de 2017 y el 31 de mayo de 2019, se registró un total de 7.596 nacimientos en el Servicio de Alto Riesgo Obstétrico del Hospital Carlos Andrade Marín; de ellos, hubo 117 pacientes diagnosticadas de embarazo ectópico. La prevalencia del embarazo ectópico en el Hospital Carlos Andrade Marín, entre los años 2017 y 2019, fue de 1,5%; la tasa de embarazo ectópico es de 15,40 / 1.000 gestaciones. Conclusiones: el análisis de los datos obtenidos de las historias clínicas evidenció que la tasa de prevalencia de embarazo ectópico en el Servicio de Alto Riesgo Obstétrico del Hospital Carlos Andrade Marín es similar a la reportada por diferentes estudios realizados alrededor del mundo.
Descargas
Citas
Barnhart KT, Franasiak JM. Tubal ectopic pregnancy. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 191. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2018;131:e65-77.
Bouyer J, Coste J, Fernandez H, Pouly JL, Job-Spira N. Sites of ectopic pregnancy: a 10 years population-based study of 1800 cases. Hum Reprod 2002;17(12):3224-3230.
Beera Neelima, VG Vanamala. Risk factors of ectopic pregnancy: a study in a tertiary care centre. June 2017, 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20172589
Creanga AA, Syverson C, Seed K, Callaghan WM. Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 2011-2013. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:366-373.
Cabrera Samith I, Perales I, Romero G. Análisis epidemiológico y clínico del embarazo ectópico: Hospital Base de Los Ángeles. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. [Internet]. 2010 [citado 2019 Jul 04]; 75(2): 96-100. Disponible en: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-75262010000200004&lng=es. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-75262010000200004.
Van Den Eeden SK, Shan J, Bruce C, Glasser M. Ectopic pregnancy rate and treatment utilization in a large managed care organization. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:1052.
Stulberg DB, Cain LR, Dahlquist I, Lauderdale DS. Ectopic pregnancy rates and racial disparities in the Medicaid population, 2004-2008. Fertil Steril 2014;102:1671
Parker VL, et al. Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. Arch GynecolObstet 2016;294:19-27.
Usandizaga J, De la Fuente. Obstetricia y Ginecología. 2da. edición. España. Marbán. 2011;pp:310-320.
Barnhart KT, Sammel MD, Gracia CR, Chittams J,Hummel AC, Shaunik A. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in women with symptomatic first-trimester pregnancies. Fertil Steril 2006;86:36-43.
Ankum WM, Mol BW, Van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM.Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 1996;65:1093-1099.
Kamwendo F, Forslin L, Bodin L, Danielsson D. Epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy during a 28 years period and the role of pelvic inflammatory disease. Sex Transm Infect 2000;76:28.
Davies B, Turner KM, Frølund M, et al. Risk of reproductive complications following chlamydia testing: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Denmark. Lancet Infect Dis 2016;16:1057.
Backman T, Rauramo I, Huhtala S, Koskenvuo M.Pregnancy during the use of levonorgestrel intrauterine system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:50-54.
Sivin I. Dose- and age-dependent ectopic pregnancy risks with intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:291.
Li C, Zhao WH, Meng CX, et al. Contraceptive use and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: A multi-center case-control study. PLoS One 2014;9:e115031
Larimore WL, Stanford JB. Postfertilization effects of oral contraceptives and their relationship to informed consent. Arch Fam Med 2000;9:126.
Berek, Jonathan S. Berek y Novak Ginecología. 15 va edición. España. Lippincott Castellano. 2013;pp.421.
Protocolos Medicina Maternofetal. Hospital Clínic-Hospital Sant Joan de Déu- Universitat de Barcelona. Protocolo: Gestación ectópica tubárica y no tubárica. 2018. Disponible en: www.medicinafetalbarcelona.org
Barnhart K, Sammel MD, Chung K, Zhou L, Hummel AC, Guo W. Decline of serum human chorionic gonadotropin and spontaneous complete abortion: defining the normal curve. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:975-981.
Kadar N, Romero R. Serial human chorionic gonadotropin measurements in ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:1239-1240.
The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Early diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. Feltil Steril 2004 Sep;82(Suppl 1):S146-814.
Stovall TG, Ling FW, Cope BJ, Buster JE. Preventing ruptured ectopic pregnancy with a single serum progesterone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:1425-1428.
Lipscomb GH. Medical therapy for ectopic pregnancy. Semin Reprod Med 2007;25:93-98.
Barnhart KT, Gosman G, Ashby R, Sammel M. The medical management of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis comparing “single dose” and “multidose” regimens. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:778.
Starndell A, Thorburn J, Hamberger L. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in assisted reproduction. Fertl Steril 1999;71:282-286.
Farquhar CM. Ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 2005;366:583-591.
Hajenius PJ, Mol BWJ, Bossuyt PMM, Ankum WM, Van der Veen F. Interventions fortubal ectopic pregnancy. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 1.Art. No.: CD000324. DOI: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD000324
Kirk E, Condous G, Bourne T. The non-surgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:91-100.
Walker J. Guidelines on diagnosing ectopic pregnancy. 2002. The ectopic pregnancytrust. Disponible en: www.ectopic.org
Ectopic pregnancy--United States, 1990-1992. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1995;44: 46-48.
Coste J, Job-Spira N, Fernandez H, Papiernik E, Spira A. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: A case-control study in France, with special focus on infectious factors. Am J Epidemiol 1991;133:839-849.
Mäkinen JI, Erkkola RU, Laippala PJ. Causes of the increase in the incidence of ectopic pregnancy. A study on 1017 patients from 1966 to 1985 in Turku, Finland. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:642-646.
Egger M, Low N, Smith GD, Lindblom B, Herrmann B. Screening for chlamydial infections and the risk of ectopic pregnancy in a county in Sweden: Ecological analysis. BMJ 1998; 316:1776-1780.
Kamwendo F, Forslin L, Bodin L, Danielsson D. Epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy during a 28 years period and the role of pelvic inflammatory disease. Sex Transm Infect 2000;76: 28-32.
Bouyer J, Rachou E, Germain E, Fernandez H, Coste J, Pouly JL, et al. Risk factors for extrauterine pregnancy in women using an intrauterine device. Fertil Steril 2000;74:899-908.
Fernandez H, Bouyer J, Coste J, Job-Spira N. The hidden side of ectopic pregnancy: The hormonal factor. Hum Reprod 1996;11:243-234.
Malacova E, Kemp A, Hart R, et al. Long-term risk of ectopic pregnancy varies by method of tubal sterilization: a whole-population study. Fertil Steril 2014;101:728.
Perkins RB, Morgan JR, Awosogba TP, et al. Gynecologic outcomes after hysteroscopic and laparoscopic sterilization Procedures. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:843.
Li C, Zhao WH, Zhu Q, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a multi-center case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15:187.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Darwin Logroño, Jorge Ramírez, Adriana Campoverde
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
