Tiempo de sondaje postquirúrgico recomendado para  evitar complicaciones en cirugías endourológicas del  tracto urinario inferior

Marco Efraín Pacheco Sacoto; Hugo Marcelo Garzón Ávila

doi:10.47464/MetroCiencia/vol28/4/2020/16-20

Authors

Marco Efraín Pacheco Sacoto Universidad Central del Ecuador https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5365-7810
Hugo Marcelo Garzón Ávila Hospital de Especialidades Fuerzas Armadas HE1 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9164-8798

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47464/MetroCiencia/vol28/4/2020/16-20

Keywords:

Urinary catheters, postoperative period, lower urinary tract, urethral stricture, transurethral resection of prostate

Abstract

Objective: To determine the recommended post-surgical probing time to avoid complications in endourological surgeries of the lower urinary tract. Materials and methods: An updated bibliographic review was carried out on the recommended post-surgical catheterization time to avoid complications in endourological surgeries of the lower urinary tract. Results: An association was found between a longer catheterization time and the occurrence of subsequent complications related to endourological surgeries of the lower urinary tract, with the period of less than 72h being the optimal period for the permanence of the postsurgical urinary catheter in this type of intervention. No risk factors associated with prolonged postoperative probing time were identified. Recommendations: The type of endoscopic approach has now become the gold standard treatment for most lower urinary tract pathologies; However, more studies are required on the complications and risk factors related to the time of postoperative catheterization to avoid complications in endourological surgeries of the lower urinary tract.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marco Efraín Pacheco Sacoto, Universidad Central del Ecuador

Posgradista Urología, Quito, Ecuador
Hugo Marcelo Garzón Ávila, Hospital de Especialidades Fuerzas Armadas HE1

Servicio de Urología, Quito - Ecuador

References

Komura K, Inamoto T, Takai T, Uchimoto T, Saito K, Tanda N, et al. Incidence of urethral stricture after bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate using TURis: results from a randomised trial. BJU International. 2015;115(4):644-52.

Chen C-H, Chung C-H, Chu H-C, Chen K-C, Ho C-H. Surgical outcome of anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Andrologia. 2020;52(8):e13612.

Smith AD. Smith’s Textbook of Endourology. PMPH-USA; 2007. 1026 p.

Reddy SK, Utley V, Gilling PJ. The Evolution of Endoscopic Prostate Enucleation: A historical perspective. Andrologia. 2020;52(8):e13673.

Enikeev D, Shariat SF, Taratkin M, Glybochko P. The changing role of lasers in urologic surgery. Current Opinion in Urology. enero de 2020;30(1):24–29.

Castellani D, Pirola GM, Pacchetti A, Saredi G, Dellabella M. State of the Art of Thulium Laser Enucleation and Vapoenucleation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review. Urology. 1 de febrero de 2020;136:19-34.

Gallegos MA, Santucci RA. Advances in urethral stricture management. F1000Res [Internet]. 23 de diciembre de 2016 [citado 13 de diciembre de 2020];5. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225410/

Guo R-Q, Yu W, Meng Y-S, Zhang K, Xu B, Xiao Y-X, et al. Correlation of benign prostatic obstruction-related complications with clinical outcomes in patients after transurethral resection of the prostate. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences. 2017;33(3):144-51.

Kirmusaoglu S, Yurdugül S, Metin A, Vehid S. The Effect of Urinary Catheters on Microbial Biofilms and Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections. 1. 16 de marzo de 2017;14(2):3028-34.

Shuman EK, Chenoweth CE. Urinary Catheter-Associated Infections. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America. 2018;32(4):885-97.

Li S, Kwong JSW, Zeng X-T, Ruan X-L, Liu T-Z, Weng H, et al. Plasmakinetic resection technology for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. 9 de julio de 2015;5(1):12002.

Söğütdelen E, Haberal H, Guliyev F, Akdogan B. Urethral Stricture is an Unpleasant Complication after Prostate Surgery: A Critical Review of Current Literature. Journal of Urological Surgery. 30 de marzo de 2016;3:1-6.

Grechenkov A, Sukhanov R, Bezrukov E, Butnaru D, Barbagli G, Vasyutin I, et al. Risk factors for urethral stricture and/or bladder neck contracture after monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urologia. 1 de noviembre de 2018;85(4):150-7.

Smith TG. Current management of urethral stricture disease. Indian J Urol. 2016;32(1):27-33.

Zamel AA, Kassem AI, Orban TZ, Saad IR, Bedair AS. Urethral stricture disease after bipolar prostatectomy: Is it a concern? African Journal of Urology. 2018;24(1):24-7.

Marschall J, Carpenter CR, Fowler S, Trautner BW. Antibiotic prophylaxis for urinary tract infections after removal of urinary catheter: meta-analysis. BMJ. 11 de junio de 2013;346:f3147.

Zegers Bas, Uiterwaal Cuno, Kimpen Jan, van Gool Jan, de Jong Tom, Winkler-Seinstra Pauline, et al. Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Urinary Tract Infections in Children With Spina Bifida on Intermittent Catheterization. Journal of Urology. 1 de diciembre de 2011;186(6):2365-71.

Cruz García-Villa P, Schroede-Ugalde M, Landa Soler-Martín M, Mendoza-Peña F. Factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de estenosis de uretra en pacientes operados de resección transuretral de próstata. Rev Mex Urol. 1 de julio de 2013;73(4):166-74.

Partin AW, Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Peters CA, Dmochowski RR. Campbell Walsh Wein Urology, E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2020. 5215 p.

Smith JA, Howards SS, Preminger GM, Dmochowski RR. Hinman’s Atlas of Urologic Surgery E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016. 1011 p.

Broseta E, Budía A, Burgués J, Luján S, Serrano A, Jiménez-Cruz J. Atlas quirúrgico de Urología Práctica. Vol. 53. 2008.