Emerging Trends in Pre-Anesthetic Assessment: A Systematic Review of Novel Approaches and Technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47464/MetroCiencia/vol32/3/2024/35-42Keywords:
pre-anesthetic assesment, trends, Information Technology, perioperative, optimizationAbstract
In order to understand the current evolution, this systematic review examines the advances in preanesthetic assessment. Although the paper demonstrates the potential to revolutionize patient care, it also recognizes its limitations. These include publication bias and search limitations. At the same time, the general exposure to advances in preoperative care, including but not limited to technology and patient-centered approaches, may be valuable to the research. The nature of survey research is complicated because studies vary in quality and are prone to bias. Nevertheless, studies should be conducted on a regular basis, and techniques for assessing preanesthetic should be improved. Furthermore, this improvement should take into account patient outcomes and their subsequent need for surgical safety. Although achievements in assessment systems have limitations, prospective developments aim to fill gaps, including deficiencies in current approaches. This fact is beneficial for both patients and healthcare providers, and underscores the importance of innovation and EBP practices for preanesthetic assessment and overall quality of perioperative care.
Downloads
References
Kristoffersen EW, Opsal A, Tveit TO, Berg RC, Fossum M. Effectiveness of pre-anesthetic assessment clinic: a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized prospective controlled studies. BMJ Open [Internet]. BMJ; 2022 May;12(5): e054206. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054206
Carrero E, Gomar C, Penzo W, Rull M. Comparison between lecture-based approach and case/problem-based learning discussion for teaching pre-anesthetic assessment. European Journal of Anesthesiology [Internet]. Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health); 2007 Dec;24(12):1008–1015. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0265021506002304
Ausset S, Bouaziz H, Brosseau M, Kinirons B, Benhamou D. Improvement of information gained from the pre-anesthetic visit through a quality-assurance programme. British Journal of Anesthesia [Internet]. Elsevier BV; 2002 Feb;88(2):280–283. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/88.2.280
Sobrie O, Lazouni MEA, Mahmoudi S, Mousseau V, Pirlot M. A new decision support model for preanesthetic evaluation. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine [Internet]. Elsevier BV; 2016 Sep; 133:183–193. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.05.021
Le Guen M, Squara P, Ma S, Adjavon S, Trillat B, Merzoug M, Aegerter P, Fischler M. Patch validation: an observational study protocol for the evaluation of a multilingual wearable sensor in patients during anesthesia and in the postanesthetic care unit. BMJ Open [Internet]. BMJ; 2020 Sep;10(9): e040453. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040453
Idoffsson Å, Olsson C, Holmén A, Granberg-Axell A, Chew MS. Development and validation of an instrument to measure nursing workload in the postanesthetic care unit. European Journal of Anesthesiology [Internet]. Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health); 2020 Aug 21;37(10):864–873. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000001284
Kahl U, Boehm A, Krause L, Klinger R, Stamenov K, Zöllner C, Plümer L, Fischer M. Psychometric evaluation of the modified quality of recovery score for the postanesthetic care unit (QoR-PACU2) – a prospective validation study. Anesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine [Internet]. Elsevier BV; 2024 Mar;101380. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101380
Breteler MJM, Huizinga E, van Loon K, Leenen LPH, Dohmen DAJ, Kalkman CJ, Blokhuis TJ. Reliability of wireless monitoring using a wearable patch sensor in high-risk surgical patients at a step-down unit in the Netherlands: a clinical validation study. BMJ Open [Internet]. BMJ; 2018 Feb;8(2): e020162. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020162
Sarkis-Onofre R, Catalá-López F, Aromataris E, Lockwood C. How to properly use the PRISMA Statement. Systematic Reviews [Internet]. Springer Science and Business Media LLC; 2021 Apr 19;10(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01671-z
Aust H, Eberhart LHJ, Kalmus G, Zoremba M, Rüsch D. Relevance of five core aspects of the pre-anesthesia visit. Der Anesthetist [Internet]. Springer Science and Business Media LLC; 2010 Dec 15;60(5):414–420. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00101-010-1828-1
Manjit G, Girijanandan M, Sunitha Z, Lintu G, Linby C, Sruthy V. Study on airway assessment practices for elective procedures during pre-anesthetic evaluation in COVID-19 pandemic- A national online survey (SAFE PAC Survey). Journal of Anesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology [Internet]. Medknow; 2022;38(5):79. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_138_21
Role of Telehealth in Pre-anesthetic Evaluations. [Internet]. PubMed. 2019. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31587743/
Metterlein T, Wobbe T, Brede M, Möller K, Röder D, Krannich J, Kranke P, Tannert A, Broscheit J. Effectiveness of pre-anesthetic video information on patient anxiety and economical aspects. Saudi Journal of Anesthesia [Internet]. Medknow; 2021;15(2):127. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_968_20
Kristoffersen EW, Opsal A, Tveit TO, Berg RC, Fossum M. Effectiveness of pre-anaesthetic assessment clinic: a systematic review of randomised and non-randomised prospective controlled studies. BMJ Open [Internet]. BMJ; 2022 May;12(5):e054206. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054206
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Andres Sebastian Viteri Hinojosa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


