Treatment of urolithiasis: currently is there any space for laparoscopy?

Authors

  • Roberto Almeida Carrera Hospital Carlos Andrade Marín
  • Luis Gómez López Universidad Central del Ecuador

Keywords:

laparoscopic ureterolithotomy, ureteral stones, pyelic stones, ureterorenoscopy, shock wave lithotripsy

Abstract

Introduction: The development of minimal access techniques in the treatment of urolithiasis has changed the management of this condition today; however the therapeutic challenge remains in patients with complex stones in proximal ureter and renal pelvis in which laparoscopic surgery is a good option. Materials and Methods: 10 patients were treated during the first half of 2016, whith diagnosis of complex pelvic lithiasis and proximal ureteral stones (> 15 mm); laparoscopic surgery was indicated. The mean age was 38 years (± 11.66). The location of these lithiasis was 8 proximal ureter and 2 in the renal pelvis. Results: Operative time ranged from 65 minutes to 270 minutes; the mean blood loss was 31.25 cc (± 6.29), drain production on the first day was between 36 ml - 45 ml. Postoperative pain on the first day after surgery was 3.5 (VAS) (± 2.22). The cosmetic result was very satisfactory for all, with an average of 9.5 (± 0.05). stone-free rate was 100%. Discussion: The management of bulky proximal ureteral stones or complex pyelic stones are a challenge because of its low stone-free rate either with ureterorenoscopy or external shock wave lithotripsy; an option for treating this type of stones is laparoscopic surgery, with a stone-free rate up to 100% in a single session and improving parameters such as hospital stay, requirement for additional analgesic treatment, early recovery, and cosmetic results. Conclusions: In complex situations ureteral or pyelic stones are successfully treated through laparoscopic approach, being an ideal choice to replace the open approach and endoruologic methods in selected cases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Roberto Almeida Carrera, Hospital Carlos Andrade Marín

    Cirujano Urólogo , Quito Ecuador

  • Luis Gómez López, Universidad Central del Ecuador

    Médico Postgradista R4 de Urología , Quito Ecuador

References

García E, Sánchez N, Molina P. Tendencia en los tratamientos invasivos en la litiasis. Malaga: Elsevier; 2014 [cited 2016 Junio 27. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210480614001454.

Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Skolarikos A, M S, et al. Guidelines on Urolithiasis [Guidelines].; 2016 [cited 2016 Junio 29. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guideline/urolithiasis/.

Borges D, Gonçalves R, Ribas M, Pierote de Oliveira B. Tratamiento laparoscópico de la ureterolitiasis: nuestra. Belo Horizonte: Elsevier; 2009 [cited 2016 Junio 27. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210480609742056.

Breivik H, Borchgrevink4 M, Allen A, Rosselan L, Romundstad K, Hals B, et al. Assessment of pain [Resvista eléctronica BJA].; 2008 [cited 2016 Juliio 2016. Available from: http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/content/101/1/17.full.pdf+html.

Duncan J, Bond T, Mason A, Ludlow P, Cridland S, O'Kane M, et al. Visual analogue scale scoring and ranking: a suitable and sensitive method for assessing scar quality? [American Society of Plastic Surgeons].; 2006 [cited 2016 Julio 24. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16980850.

Duza G, Palermo M, Acquafresca P, Blanco L, Zorraquín C. Apendicectomía laparoscópica por incisión única.; 2014 [cited 2016 Julio 24. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rcci/v29n1/v29n1a5.pdf.

Miranda L. Actualización en el tratamiento de las cicatrices hipertroficas postquirurgicas. Revisión de la literatura [Tesis]. Barcelona; 2015

[cited 2016 Julio 24. Available from: http://www.semcc.com/master/files/Cicatrices%20hipertroficas%20postquirurgicas%20-%20Dra.%20Salvador.pdf.

Dindo D, Demartines N, Pierre-Alain C. Classification of Surgical Complications A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and [Document].: Annals of Surgery; 2004 [cited 2016 Julio 24. Available from: http://www.aqc.ch/download/HSM_Suppl_7_Dindo-Clavien_classification.pdf.

Qiang L, Pengchao L, Jun T, Q C, Changjun , Y. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic tecnique in treantment of complex renal stones [Suplement]. Nanjing: Elsevier; 2015 [cited 2016 Junio 30. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022534715013816.

Penña J, Pascual M, Salvador J, Rosales A. Evolución delacirugía abierta versus laparoscópica/robótica. Barcelona : Elseiver; 2010 [cited 2016 Junio 27. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210480610000458?np=y.

Chiu C, Chang CH, Wu C, Huang P. The comparison of peritoneal, retro-peritoneal and transperitoneal robotic assisted laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large proximal ureteral stone.: Elsevier; 2015 [cited 2106 Junio 27. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/

article/pii/S1569905615609708.

Kadyan V, Sabale D, Mane V, Satav A, Mulay N, Thakur S, et al. Large proximal ureteral stones: Ideal treatment modality? Urology Annals. 2016 July; 8(2).

Ahmet T, Abdulkadir T, Tolga A, Muzaffer A, Murat B, Mert A, et al. The comparison of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous

nephrolithotomy in the treatment of solitary large renal pelvic stones. Stockholm; 2012 [cited 216 Junio 30. Available from: http://link.springer.

com/article/10.1007%2Fs00240-012-0463-5.

Skolarikosa A, Alivizatosa G, de la Rosetteb J. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and its Legacy. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2004 [cited 2016 Junio 30. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283804004099.

Xinghuan W, Sheng L, Tongzu L, Yi G, Zhonghua Y. Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy Compared to Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy as Surgical Management for Large Renal Pelvic Calculi: A Meta-Analysis. Wuhan: Elsevier; 2013 [cited 2016 Junio 30. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022534713003686.

Kadyan V SDMVSAMNTS. Large proximal ureteral stones: Ideal treatment modality?. Maharashtra; 2016 [cited 2016 Julio 5. Available from: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4839237/.

Daniels P, Stefanie H, Bernhard K, Roland S, George N, Beat R. Optimization of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Delivery Rates Achieves Excellent Outcomes for Ureteral Stones: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial. Bern: Elsevier; 2015 [cited 2016 Junio

Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022534715002359.

Singh V, Janak R, Kumar Dheeraj KM, Akhtar A. Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparison Study.: Elsevier; 2013 [cited 2016 Junio 27. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022534712050136.

Ko H, Kim J, Kang S, Pyun J, Kang S, Lee J, et al. LAPAROSCOPIC URETEROLITHOTOMY AS A PRIMARY MODALITY FOR

LARGE PROXIMAL URETERAL CALCULI: COMPARISON TO RIGID URETEROSCOPIC PNEUMATIC LITHOTRIPSY.: Elsivier; 2011. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569905611602418.

Manish G, Vishwajeet S, Rahul S, Satya S, Manoj K, col. y. Prospective Randomized Comparison of Open versus Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: Experience of a Single Center from Northern India.; 2013 [cited 2016 July 08. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4017744/.

Goel , A H, AK. Upper and mid-ureteric stones: a prospective unrandomized comparison of retroperitoneoscopic and open ureterolithotomy [Upper and mid ureteric stone: A prospective].: BJUI; 2001 [cited 2016 july 08. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.00150.x/full.

Selçuk S, Bekir A, Eks M, Nevzat C, Volkan T. Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy.; 2016. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27019576.

Girard F, Méria P, Desgrandchamps F. Cirugía laparoscópica de los cálculos del aparato urinario superior.; 2013 [cited 2016 Junio 27.

Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1761331013641602.

Published

2020-09-03

Issue

Section

Scientific articles (news)

How to Cite

Treatment of urolithiasis: currently is there any space for laparoscopy?. (2020). Metro Ciencia, 24(1), 37-42. https://mail.revistametrociencia.com.ec/index.php/revista/article/view/11

Similar Articles

1-10 of 68

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.